Good morning. Today, my colleague Dana Goldstein explains a major change in U.S. public education. We're also covering Israel, durian and the Tonys. —David Leonhardt
School's out
An overwhelming majority of American students attend public schools. But that number is falling. In part, that's because in more than half of states, parents can now use public money to educate their kids — at home, online, in private schools. This year, a million students used some kind of private education voucher, more than double the figure from four years earlier, according to new research from EdChoice, a group that supports private-school choice and tracks the sector. The result is a growing movement of choose-your-own-adventure education. Parents are permitted to find any program that they think fits their beliefs and their kids' needs. Yet it's unclear how, or whether, accountability or standards will be enforced outside traditional schools. What's driving this change? The pandemic prompted many families to reconsider how their children learn. Republican lawmakers embraced private-school choice as part of a broader push for parental rights. (They also see the issue as a way to appeal to young parents — often Black and Latino — who are critical of how public schools serve their children.) And teachers are reporting intense burnout, with some leaving public schools to open small businesses that can accept these vouchers. I wrote about these "microschools" in a story The Times published this morning. In today's newsletter, I'll explain why parents are opting out of public schools — and what it might mean for how this country educates all of its children. What's the appeal?
I recently spent a week in the Atlanta area, talking to parents who pulled their children out of public schools to attend microschools. Some have as few as six students. While most are run by career educators, they don't have to be: The sector is unregulated, and anyone can open a microschool. Next year, Georgia will start offering $6,500, through an education savings account, to families who withdraw their children from schools in the bottom 25 percent academically. Some parents I met hope to spend that money on the microschools, home-schooling supplies, therapy or tutoring. A few were Christian conservatives who want the Bible taught as history. One mother complained about L.G.B.T.Q. public school educators and lamented what she said was an emphasis on gender and race. But more common were parents who had nothing against public school except that their children failed to thrive there. Nicole Timmons said her daughter, Sienna, 15, was not moving forward academically. Sienna now attends C.H.O.I.C.E. Preparatory Academy, a microschool in Gwinnett County. It serves an almost all-Black student body. On an April afternoon there, I saw about 40 students, ages 8 to 17, working in small groups on Greek and Latin word roots and building simple electromagnetic motors. The boom in nontraditional education comes with a new political vocabulary. Conservatives who think the government should give parents money for these programs no longer talk much about vouchers. Now they praise money sent directly to families in education savings accounts and buzz about "entrepreneurship" and "permissionless education" — no teachers' unions or curriculum mandates, and far less standardized testing. Little accountabilityAs parents spend state money, the marketplace for private education is growing — with few quality checks. Teachers may not need to be certified or even hold college degrees. Facilities may not be inspected. The schools can teach whatever they like. Some states have approved questionable home-schooling expenses, such as game consoles, trampolines, snack food, televisions and theme park passes. Vouchers from recent decades showed underwhelming academic results. Private-school choice programs are popular with parents of disabled children. Public school administrators sometimes suggest vouchers to parents when their children are having difficulty, especially with behavior. But accepting a voucher often means enrolling in a program that is not required to follow federal disability law. Private educators often don't provide on-site therapies. Advocates for private-school choice embrace the lack of regulation. They say the market will correct itself as parents withdraw their children from mediocre programs. "We're in the midst of a change on what we mean by accountability," said Robert Enlow, chief executive of EdChoice, a right-leaning group. What's next
Enlow and others envision a future in which all parents, regardless of income, can spend their children's per-pupil public school funding on à la carte services — from private school tuition to music lessons to educational software. Even school districts could become players in this marketplace, selling seats in advanced courses to home-schooled students whose parents are not equipped to teach Spanish or physics. They are pitching this vision as one that can appeal to equity-minded liberals, too. Diana Lopez, whose son attended a microschool this year after struggling in public kindergarten, had generally voted for Georgia Democrats. But their party opposes education savings accounts. "I did have to start considering again who's representing us," she told me. "Are they on the same page?" Democrats and public-education supporters point out that many of the Republican-led states offering vouchers spend comparatively little on their schools anyway — so it's no wonder parents want out. For now, the percentage of American students using vouchers is small — about one in every 50 children. But it adds another challenge for traditional public schools. Nationwide, they've seen declining enrollment because of low birthrates and the appeal of other options. Now the new laws could turn private-school choice into a rival model, mirroring the rise of charter schools. For more
Israel-Hamas War
More International News
Social Media
California
Other Big Stories
Opinions
"Unlike the roadrunner, I chose not to run away from a threat": Andy Rementer illustrates the experience of his father, George Rementer, birding through his cancer treatment. A medical bill trap is charging patients hospital-level prices for ordinary care at a clinic. Congress needs to close the loophole of this surprise cost, Danielle Ofri writes. Gail Collins and Bret Stephens discuss an intelligence debacle and President Biden. Here is a column by Nicholas Kristof on West Coast liberals. The Games Sale. Limited time offer. Come play with us. Subscribe to New York Times Games for 50% off your first year. Strengthen your Wordle strategy with WordleBot (now in the app), reach Genius on Spelling Bee, and play The Crossword, Tiles and more.
Durian: China's demand for durian, a rich and smelly fruit, has razed landscapes and made fortunes in Southeast Asia. New York castle: Derek Jeter finally found a buyer for his home. See inside. Health: Some common medications, including antidepressants and blood pressure pills, can make heat waves more dangerous. Read what to know. Ethicist: "I think my husband has dementia. Can I leave him before it worsens?" Calculator: What are the homes in "Bridgerton" worth? Pride: Visit these five places during the celebrations in New York. Goodbye, work friends: Our workplace advice columnist says farewell to her readers. Metropolitan Diary: Stuck in an elevator in summer. Lives Lived: James Kent was a distinguished chef and successful Manhattan restaurateur who seemed poised to become a food-industry tycoon. He died at 45.
Golf: Bryson DeChambeau outlasted Rory McIlroy by one shot to win his second U.S. Open. Euros: The Netherlands beat Poland; Denmark drew, 1-1, with Slovenia; and England beat Serbia. Read a recap of the weekend. W.N.B.A.: Caitlin Clark produced the best all-around game of her young professional career as the Indiana Fever defeated the Chicago Sky and fellow star rookie Angel Reese. It might be the start of a new rivalry. N.B.A. Finals: Game 5 is tonight. The Celtics star Kyrie Irving will try to keep the Dallas Mavericks' season alive.
The Tony Awards were last night. Here's a recap of the big winners: Best new musical: "The Outsiders," based on the classic young adult novel. Best new play: "Stereophonic," which is about a band making an album. Best musical revival: Stephen Sondheim's "Merrily We Roll Along" completed a four-decade journey from flop to hit and won the prize. More on culture
Make this lemon poppy seed poundcake. Buy these 20 great wines for under $20. They're perfect for hot weather. Clean your pet's hair easily. Take our news quiz.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram were coauthor and cutthroat. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku, Connections and Strands. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
|
lunes, 17 de junio de 2024
The Morning: Public money, private education
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
ROPA Y COMPLEMENTOS ALIAZON
ROPA Y COMPLEMENTOS
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario