Welcome back! Today is the second anniversary of the Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. Today, senior correspondent Nicole Narea is here to show what that decision has wrought.
—Caroline Houck, senior editor of news |
|
|
Joan Wong, Paige Vickers/Vox; Getty Images |
What two years without Roe looks like, in 6 charts |
For 49 years after Roe v. Wade, Americans had the right to obtain an abortion if they became pregnant. Then, two years ago, with Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court put an end to it. The Biden administration and some blue states — supported by a network of nonprofits focused on reproductive care — aggressively sought to compensate, while many red states enacted near-total bans on abortion. But Dobbs has nevertheless had a devastating effect on pregnant people in huge swaths of the country. Large reproductive care deserts have emerged in which there are no abortion providers for hundreds of miles. Pregnant people are being denied necessary medical care as their doctors fear the legal repercussions of providing it. All of this has exacerbated long-standing inequities. Both abortion bans and attacks on reproductive rights are broadly unpopular, and elections in the years since Dobbs showed that abortion rights were a potent motivating issue for voters. But in this year's matchup between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, there's a question as to whether the issue will continue to motivate American voters. It is not too late for their votes to make a difference for reproductive access. It may seem like the worst has already come to pass for the abortion rights movement: though once protected by the constitution nationally, access now increasingly depends on where you live or whether you can afford to travel for the care you need. But Republicans have also made clear that they have no intention of stopping there. |
How the landscape has changed |
In the wake of Dobbs, 13 states immediately implemented "trigger" bans on abortion, while others sought to enforce abortion restrictions that were on the books before Roe v. Wade was even decided in 1973 or quickly moved to pass new bans on abortion. A new patchwork of abortion laws was established in the US within months. A total of 14 states have enacted near-total bans on abortion. |
Many of these bans involved narrow medical exceptions in which abortions could be performed when the health or life of the mother was at risk. But those exceptions have proved exceptionally difficult — in some states, nigh impossible — to qualify for. Kate Cox, a Texas woman, was notably denied an abortion even though her fetus was diagnosed with a rare and terminal genetic condition and forced to travel out of state to obtain one. Other women have been forced to carry to term fetuses doctors know will die shortly upon birth, or been denied abortion care even after experiencing a miscarriage that leaves them in medical distress. The Texas Supreme Court also ruled against a group of 20 women who claimed that they had been denied medically necessary abortions. Despite the new restrictions on abortion in many parts of the country, the number of abortions performed nationally has actually gone up slightly since Dobbs. But it would be a mistake to see that statistic and say that everyone has improved access to abortion equally across the US. "While the numbers have gone up a bit nationally, in some states, there are virtually no abortions happening," at least in a formal health care setting, said Usha Ranji, associate director for women's health policy at KFF, a health policy research and news organization. |
The use of medication abortion, which can end a pregnancy during the first trimester, has gone up in particular. Though it was already the most common method of obtaining an abortion pre-Dobbs, it is now cheaper and easier to obtain quickly, especially via telemedicine. That's because, amid the pandemic, the FDA suspended the requirement that mifepristone be dispensed in person, resulting in an explosion of telemedicine abortion services. However, 19 states have banned telemedicine abortion: Five do so explicitly, and the other 14 require that a prescribing clinician be physically present with the patient. Some states also require counseling or an ultrasound prior to administering an abortion, which can rule out obtaining medication abortion via telemedicine. That has caused some patients to turn to community networks or websites that sell abortion pills without interacting with a clinician or pharmacy. |
All of this is a reflection of the monumental effort in states without bans to scale up care, as well as the flood of donations to abortion funds post-Dobbs. New Mexico, for instance, dedicated $10 million to building a new abortion clinic that opened last year on its border with Texas, which has banned abortion with limited exceptions. But the question is whether this patchwork solution is sustainable in the long run, especially given that those funds are drying up. And it doesn't entirely mitigate the impact of abortion bans, which have created maternal care deserts across large tracts of the southern US and Midwest. "There are still people who are not getting abortions that they would want in part because not everybody can travel," Ranji said. |
Travel might be difficult for both logistical and financial reasons. And poor women are disproportionately affected: Those women (defined as those who live under 200 percent of the poverty line, which was $46,060 for a family of three in 2022) are concentrated in the 14 states that have banned abortion and the 11 states that have passed strict gestational limits on abortion. Though they may be candidates for medication abortion, they are less likely to know about it as an option — a messaging challenge that abortion activists are struggling to overcome. |
Anecdotally, physicians have also reported concerns about their ability to provide adequate reproductive care since the Dobbs decision came down. A KFF national survey of OBGYNs found that significant shares of respondents were concerned about their ability to administer a level of care consistent with the medical profession's standards, their potential legal liability in states where abortion is banned, and health outcomes for their patients. In states where abortion is banned or restricted, for example, six in 10 OBGYNs say their decision-making autonomy has become worse since the Dobbs ruling. "They're in this place where they have to really contemplate whether they continue to provide care within that state, or whether they leave the state so that they can actually practice medicine in a way that complies with the standards of care," Gibson said. —Nicole Narea, senior reporter |
|
|
| The Ultimate Fighting Championship went from niche bloodsport to multibillion-dollar league. Donald Trump might be its biggest fan. Journalists Luke Thomas and Sam Eagan explain the culture and politics of the UFC. |
|
|
- Ashley, meet Ashly and Ashleigh: Trendy baby names — including just different spellings of the same name — say a lot about when you were born. [Washington Post]
- Deadpool and Wolverine's one gay joke: Isn't it funny that Deadpool and Wolverine are just a little bit gay? (Nope.) [Vox]
|
- Why Israel acts the way it does: The bleak mindset behind Israel's war in Gaza, explained. [Vox]
- China's energy demand per person surpasses Europe's: In large part because of the technology and manufacturing industries. [Bloomberg]
- We're a little less than one week out from the first round of the surprise French elections: And the country is not handling it well at all. [NYT]
- Why Latin American leaders are obsessed with mega prisons: El Salvador has touted its tough-on-crime policies (and kept quiet on the concurrent human rights issues). Now everyone wants to try. [Vox]
|
- Love Vox podcasts? Then help us make a new one, launching this fall! Each episode will start with a question from Vox readers and listeners — ranging from culture and finance to politics and technology, and more! Anything from why dating feels harder these days to why jars are so hard to open. If you want something in your world explained, and Google can't get you the answer, submit questions to askvox@vox.com or give us a call at 1-800-618-8545.
|
|
|
Why do all the world's best athletes do Subway commercials? |
Whizy Kim explains why Patrick Mahomes, Serena Williams, and Steph Curry all rep the sandwich chain. Read more » |
| |
|
Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can sign up for it right here.
And as always, we want to know what you think. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story you're curious to learn more about, let us know by filling out this form or just replying to this email.
Today's edition was produced and edited by Caroline Houck. We'll see you tomorrow! |
|
|
Become a Vox Member Support our journalism — become a Vox Member and you'll get exclusive access to the newsroom with members-only perks including newsletters, bonus podcasts and videos, and more. |
| |
|
This email was sent to comercialyventas.aliperiodicos@blogger.com. Manage your email preferences or unsubscribe. If you value Vox's unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring contribution. View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service. Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036.
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|
