Good morning. We're covering the rightward shift among voters of color — as well as Antony Blinken, electric cars and the Harlem Renaissance.
A misleading storyAfter Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, many political scientists and pundits came forth with a simple explanation. Trump had won, they said, because of white Americans' racial resentment. These analysts looked at surveys and argued that the voters who had allowed Trump to win were distinguished not by social class, economic worries or any other factor but by their racial fears. "Another study shows Trump won because of racial anxieties — not economic distress," as a typical headline, in The Intercept, put it. I never found this argument to be persuasive. Yes, race played a meaningful role in Trump's victory, given his long history of remarks demeaning people of color. But politics is rarely monocausal. And there were good reasons — including Barack Obama's earlier success with Trump voters — to believe that the 2016 election was complex, too. Eight years later, the "it's all racial resentment" argument doesn't look merely questionable. It looks wrong. Skewed polls?Since Trump's victory, a defining feature of American politics has been the rightward shift of voters of color. Asian, Black and Hispanic voters have all become less likely to support Democratic candidates and more likely to support Republicans, including Trump. In each group, the trend is pronounced among working-class voters, defined as those without a four-year college degree. (The Democrats' performance among nonwhite voters with a college degree has held fairly stable.)
If anything, Democrats' weakness among voters of colors appears to have intensified since 2022. Among white voters, President Biden has about as much support as he did four years ago, Nate Cohn, The Times's chief political analyst, has pointed out. But Biden's support among Black, Hispanic and Asian voters has plummeted. (My colleagues Jennifer Medina and Ruth Igielnik focused on the Latino shift in a recent article.) This chart compares the 2020 results with the findings from the most recent New York Times/Siena College poll:
As John Burn-Murdoch, the chief data reporter at The Financial Times, wrote last week: "I think this is simultaneously one of the most important social trends in the U.S. today, and one of the most poorly understood." This newsletter is the first of a two-part series about the development. Today, I hope to convince you that the trend is real and not simply, as some Democrats hope, a reflection of inaccurate poll numbers. In part two, I'll look more closely at the likely causes. Young populistsIt's true that polls are not the same as elections, and Biden may improve his standing by November. With far more campaign cash than Trump, Biden will have a chance to frame the election as a choice between the two, rather than a referendum on the country's condition. But the evidence for the trend is much stronger than the 2024 polls. A decade ago, many Democrats assumed that the extremely high levels of support they received from voters of color during Obama's presidency would continue. They haven't. In 2022, for instance, the party's disappointing performance among nonwhite voters helped Republicans win the national popular vote in House elections. This year, Biden may need to improve on the party's 2022 showing — which would be vastly different from what polls now show — to win re-election. "There's been a lot of whistling past the graveyard about this," Nate Silver wrote in his newsletter about the trend. "Dems ought to invest more time in figuring out why this is happening instead of hoping that the polls are skewed."
The most helpful frame is social class. In many ways, the rightward shift of voters of color is surprising, given this country's history of racial politics. I certainly did not expect the Trump era to feature a narrowing of racial polarization. But when viewed through a class lens, the shift makes more sense. In much of the world, working-class voters, across racial groups, have become attracted to a populism that leans right while sometimes including left-wing economic ideas, such as trade restrictions. This populism is skeptical of elites, political correctness, high levels of immigration and other forms of globalization. Today's populists "are more diverse than the stereotypical 'angry old white men' who, we are frequently told, will soon be replaced by a new generation of tolerant Millennials," Roger Eatwell and Matthew Goodwin, two British scholars of politics, have written. Indeed, Democrats today particularly struggle with young voters of color, Nate Cohn has explained. The old racial-resentment story about Trump's victory was alluring to many progressives because it absolved them of responsibility. If Trump's appeal was all about racism, there was no honorable way for Democrats to win back their previous supporters. The true story is both more challenging and more hopeful. The multiracial, predominantly working-class group of Americans who have soured on mainstream politics and modern liberalism are not all hateful and ignorant. They are frustrated, and their political loyalties are up for grabs. Related: I discuss the art of middlebrow politics in a Times review of two new books about U.S. history.
Israel-Hamas War
More International News
2024 Elections
Texas Border
Climate
Economy
Other Big Stories
Opinions Oprah's special on weight loss highlighted how the industry is rebranding. Telling people obesity is a disease and not their fault changes decades of messaging, Tressie McMillan Cottom writes. New York's governor wants the subway system to be safe. She should start with making stations accessible for disabled people, Julie Kim writes. Senegal's president, who refuses to leave office, threatens the country's hard-won stability, Boubacar Boris Diop writes. Here is a column by Pamela Paul on the funny stories behind our injuries. For readers of The Morning, enjoy exceptional savings for a limited time. Take advantage of the complete Times experience with our sale. Save on your first year of unlimited access to news, Games, Cooking and more. Subscribe now.
Preserved remains: This is what village life was like in Britain 3,000 years ago. Mental health: Climate cafes are offering a place for Americans to discuss their anxiety about the changing planet. Antique: A British woman bought a brooch at a fair. She didn't know how much it was worth. Talking or yapping? TikTok has repurposed an old term. Lives Lived: Martin Greenfield made suits for presidents, movie stars and athletes. For years, none knew the origin of his expertise: He learned to sew at Auschwitz. Greenfield died at 95.
M.L.B.: The Dodgers fired Ippei Mizuhara, translator for superstar Shohei Ohtani, after the player's representatives accused Mizuhara of "massive theft" to use Ohtani's money for gambling purposes. March Madness: The first round of the men's tournament tips off at noon Eastern. Sixteen games will air today. (Before the first game begins, you still have time to join The Morning's bracket pools for the men's and women's tournaments. Let us know you did with this Google form.) N.F.L.: Mike Williams signed a one-year contract with the New York Jets yesterday; a breakfast sandwich may have convinced him.
How it started: A century ago tonight, a dinner party in New York set in motion one of the most influential cultural movements of the 20th century. Charles S. Johnson and Alain Locke, two Black academic titans, gathered the brightest of Harlem's creative and political scene to mingle with white purveyors of culture. The relationships formed that night would soon blossom into the Harlem Renaissance. At the time, little was written in the news media about the party. But Veronica Chambers, a Times journalist, and Michelle May-Curry, a curator in Washington, D.C., have reconstructed the evening. They used rarely seen letters and other archival material. More on culture
Serve seared boneless chicken thighs over a bed of herbs, browned whole garlic cloves and greens. Buy a classic white T-shirt. (For men and women.) Use the best tumbler.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was fanciful. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku and Connections. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario