Good morning. We're covering Trump's slow tariff rollout — as well as immigration, abortion pills and podcasts.
Fast and slowDonald Trump's second presidency is obviously off to a fast start. In almost every area that's a priority for him and his advisers — immigration, energy, climate, race, gender and more — he has begun making major policy changes. But there is one notable exception: tariffs. Even though Trump has said that "the most beautiful word in the dictionary is 'tariff,'" he has been cautious in his first week back in office. He has not imposed the universal 10 percent or 20 percent charge on all imports that he promised during the campaign. He has instead threatened to enact targeted tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China that wouldn't take effect until Feb. 1. Trump's aides have signaled that the threat is partly a negotiating tool to win other concessions from those countries. Trump has also directed government agencies to assess the feasibility of broader tariffs and report back on the findings, which is itself a sign of his caution. Feasibility assessments are not normally the modus operandi of Trumpism. Wall Street, which tends to oppose tariffs, has noticed the caution. The S&P 500 rose again yesterday, and market analysts said the slow movement on tariffs was one reason. "The worst fears have not been realized," said David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Why is Trump proceeding more tentatively on tariffs? That's the subject of today's newsletter. Internal worries
Trump's second administration is largely unified on most big issues, at least for now. His White House advisers and cabinet secretaries agree on the importance of expanding oil and gas production. They are dismissive of the risks and costs of climate change (despite the evidence). They oppose many diversity programs. Any disagreements tend to be about secondary questions. On immigration, for example, Trump and his team favor much tougher border rules and an acceleration of deportations. The main area of internal disagreement involves a more niche subject: how many highly skilled immigrants to admit through the H-1B visa program. On tariffs, the internal tensions run deeper. Nobody publicly opposes tariffs. But some senior officials were skeptical of tariffs before they entered Trump's orbit. The corporate executives close to Trump are also wary, as is Wall Street. The stock market is one of the few traditional restraints that matter to Trump, as my colleagues Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman have noted. Trump sees stock prices as a report card on his presidency. And he knows that much of Wall Street worries that tariffs could hurt economic growth by raising prices in the U.S. and by sparking retaliatory tariffs elsewhere. Some new tariffs are still likely because of Trump's passion for them. Trade policy is a rare issue on which he has expressed consistent views for decades. (Immigration is another.) The uncertainty involves the form that the tariffs will take. Three tariff goals
Ana Swanson, who covers trade for The Times, has a helpful way of framing the issue. She points out that during the confirmation hearing for Scott Bessent, the nominee for Treasury secretary, he encouraged people to think about the Trump tariffs as having three main goals: 1. Bring production home. Bessent said tariffs could play a role in "remedying unfair trade practices" by other countries and cited China as an example. If other countries are heavily subsidizing their own companies or keeping out foreign rivals, the U.S. can respond in kind to level the playing field. The broader goal is to rework the supply chain, Ana notes. The U.S. can use tariffs to encourage more production in this country, especially in industries that are growing or militarily sensitive, by increasing the cost of foreign goods. 2. Raise revenue: Bessent's second category was "a more generalized tariff as a revenue raiser." Trump has proposed a huge tax cut, and tariffs could replace the lost revenue to keep the deficit from soaring. The Republican majorities in Congress are so narrow that a tax cut without offsetting deficit reduction may not be able to pass. House Republicans have floated cuts to Medicaid for the same reason. 3. Gain leverage: Bessent's third category was leverage with other countries: "Tariffs can be used for negotiations," he said. Trump this week threatened Russia with tariffs unless it agreed to a reasonable cease-fire in Ukraine. His planned tariffs on Canada and Mexico are partly an attempt to force concessions on border policy and a trade deal. Speaking to political and business leaders in Davos yesterday, Trump vaguely threatened new tariffs on European countries. He has long criticized Europe for not buying more American products and not spending more on their militaries. They might be willing to make some changes if the alternative is economically damaging tariffs. What's nextThe people in the administration who are wary of tariffs — you can think of them as the doves — seem to hope that this third category ends up being the dominant one. As Ana told me, "The dovish advisers want tariffs to be used as a negotiating tool that doesn't actually go into effect, or even as a negotiating tool that could lead to more market opening." The hawks are more focused on the first two categories and the actual enactment of tariffs. Trump himself is enough of a hawk that at least some tariffs probably will go into effect. Their scope may depend on what happens after that. If tariffs start to have the negative effects that their critics predict — higher inflation, lower profits and a trade war — Trump will likely pull back. If they seem to be working, or at least not failing, Trump may end up being a lot bolder than he has been in the past few days.
Immigration
Trump's Personnel
Abortion
More on Politics
International
Business
Other Big Stories
Opinions After the devastating 1871 fire, Chicago rebuilt with stronger fire protections. Los Angeles should learn from its example, Carl Smith writes. Why don't we have a cure for Alzheimer's? Because fraud and misconduct have hampered research, writes Charles Piller, an investigative science journalist. Here are columns by David Brooks on 19th-century America and Michelle Goldberg on a crackdown on the academic left. Receive free access to handpicked articles via text message. Now you can get Times journalism sent right to your phone. Each article will be accessible for 30 days.
Blood filter: A start-up claimed its device could cure cancer. Then patients began dying. Sleep: Read these six common misconceptions about sleep — and learn how to actually get a better rest. "Humanity's Last Exam": Researchers have created a 3,000-question quiz to test A.I. systems. The Ethicist: On the difference between noticing attractive women and ogling them. Quite a find: In Greece, a man discovered an ancient statue in the trash. Can't afford a new house? Build one in the backyard. Lives Lived: Charles Phan was a self-taught chef whose family fled Vietnam when he was a teenager and whose sleek restaurant helped change America's perception of Asian food. He died at 62.
Tennis: Novak Djokovic exited after just one set of his Australian Open semifinal match against Alexander Zverev. Djokovic had suffered a leg injury in his quarterfinal win. M.L.B.: The Athletic obtained audio of Ippei Mizuhara, the former translator for Dodgers superstar Shohei Ohtani, impersonating the baseball player while requesting a $200,000 wire transfer. Listen to it here. N.F.L.: Buccaneers offensive coordinator Liam Coen is expected to accept the Jaguars head-coaching job — just hours after the franchise parted ways with its general manager.
The former N.F.L. player Jason Kelce has been busy since retiring. He has built a career as an analyst and podcaster and appeared in commercials for Campbell's soup, Marriott hotels, General Mills foods, YouTube TV, Buffalo Wild Wings and Tide. This month he will begin yet another job: ESPN late-night host. More on culture
Layer smashed beef kebab over cucumber yogurt. Tell us about the one who got away. Organize your closet. Take our news quiz.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was bookmobile. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku, Connections and Strands. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
|
“Si mund t’i shkoni pas një të roituri?” Rama: Më 11 maj mund të marrim mbi
77 mandate, rezultatin do ta shkruaj në Kuç
-
Kryeministri Edi Rama ka shprehur bindjen se Partia Socialiste do të dalë
fituese në zgjedhjet e 11 majit, madje se do të marrë më shumë se 77
mandate. G...
Hace 23 horas
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario