Good morning. We're covering the power of government policies — as well as Kamala Harris on Fox, surrogacy in Italy and Liam Payne.
Against nihilismWe live in a time of cynicism about what government can accomplish. Most Americans say they don't have much trust in Washington, regardless of which party is in charge. Even when the federal government sets out to do something that Americans support, many wonder whether it can succeed. In today's newsletter, I want to connect four news stories from the past few years and argue that this cynicism has gone too far — that government can indeed accomplish what it promises. I recognize some readers will support the policies I describe, while others will oppose them. But that's OK. I'm not trying to persuade you that these policies are good or bad. The point instead is that the U.S. federal government remains a powerful force that can alter the course of American life. The country has the capacity to address its biggest problems. Whether it does is a different matter. 1. The Covid vaccineThe pandemic was so miserable and divisive that it can be easy to overlook the triumph of the federal government's vaccine development. Before Covid, the creation of any new vaccine took years. But Operation Warp Speed — a public-private partnership that received $18 billion in federal funding — led to the discovery of a Covid vaccine within months. That speed likely saved millions of lives worldwide. Yes, the pandemic was also a case study of government failure. Republican politicians (including Donald Trump, who deserves some credit for Warp Speed) refused to embrace the vaccines, leading to hesitancy that cost lives. And many Democratic-run school districts shut down for a year or longer, causing lasting damage to children. All of this, though, was a reminder of the power of government, for good and ill. 2. ImmigrationIn the debate over immigration, you sometimes hear the suggestion that the U.S. is powerless to change migration flows. "Border Enforcement Won't Solve the U.S. Migrant Crisis," as a typical op-ed argued in 2022. One way or another, according to this argument, people will find ways to enter the U.S. But that argument is mostly wrong, as the past four years show. President Biden took office promising a more welcoming approach to immigration than any president in decades. Sure enough, immigration surged. During the first three years of Biden's administration, annual net immigration (the number of people arriving, regardless of legal status, minus the number of immigrants leaving) averaged 2.4 million, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That's about three times as high as during Trump's presidency. It's more than twice as high as under Barack Obama. Late last year, Biden changed course. The administration first worked with Mexico to reduce migration flows and then tightened border policies, as my colleague Hamed Aleaziz has explained. Almost as quickly as immigration spiked in 2021, it has fallen in 2024:
A restrictive approach to border security won't keep out everybody, but it makes a huge difference. Many experts believe that the ideal immigration system would involve both a more secure border and more legal pathways to entry. That combination is well within Congress's power. 3. Economic policyBiden's economic record is obviously mixed. But he made a set of specific promises about using the federal government to rebuild infrastructure, reduce medical costs, promote clean energy and expand certain kinds of manufacturing. In each of these cases, it's happening. New semiconductor factories are being built in Arizona, Missouri, Texas and elsewhere. Roads and bridges are being rebuilt. The cost of insulin has plunged for many people. Clean energy production has increased. Biden's industrial policy has been a reminder of the vital role that the federal government has historically played in creating industries like aviation, biotechnology, fracking and the internet. 4. TaxesAs with immigration, you sometimes hear the claim that federal laws don't much matter — and particularly that the wealthy can find ways to avoid any tax increases. That's not correct. After Obama raised taxes on wealthy Americans, they paid more in taxes. After Bill Clinton raised income taxes at the start of his presidency, the same thing happened. And after Clinton later cut capital-gains taxes, tax payments fell.
If Democrats control both the White House and Congress next year, they really will be able to increase taxes on the rich. And if Republicans sweep into power, they will cut taxes on the rich. The bottom line: The fact that governments remain powerful forces even in a globalized, digitized economy doesn't answer many of the hard questions about what policymakers should do, of course. But it at least offers an antidote to the nihilism that sometimes dominates political debates.
Democratic Campaign
Republican Campaign
More on Politics
Supreme Court
International
Other Big Stories
Opinions
Times Opinion asked doctors and patients how the end of Roe has changed their lives. Hear their stories, in their own words. Daron Acemoglu, who won this year's Nobel in economics, writes that our aging population, the rise of A.I. and an end to globalization will soon reshape the U.S. economy. Here are columns by Thomas Edsall on Trump's bigotry and Charles Blow on patriarchal Black men. A subscription to match the variety of your interests. News. Games. Recipes. Product reviews. Sports reporting. A New York Times All Access subscription covers all of it and more. Subscribe today.
Taking the leap: For the first time, women participated in mountain biking's scariest (and most lucrative) event. Atlanta wings: Korean American hot wings have gotten harder to find. But you can make them at home. What it costs: A farmer in upstate New York explains why that perfect jack-o'-lantern pumpkin is worth $13.50. Storm dogs: People are more likely to foster and adopt shelter animals after a disaster. Read what to know. Lives Lived: Leif Segerstam led Finland's principal orchestras, becoming an unequaled interpreter of Sibelius. He also mystified his countrymen, in part by writing 371 symphonies — 14 in a single summer. He died at 80.
Sabrina Ionescu: The New York Liberty star hit the winner in Game 3 of the W.N.B.A. Finals against the Minnesota Lynx. W.N.B.A.: Caitlin Clark became the first rookie since 2008 to make the All-W.N.B.A. First Team. M.L.B.: Shohei Ohtani and the Dodgers exploded for eight runs in a blowout win over the Mets in the N.L.C.S. Read a recap.
Election Day is less than three weeks away. To prepare your kids, and yourself, the Book Review has a selection of children's literature and audiobooks to better understand America's current moment. The picks include "Unbought and Unbossed," a memoir by Shirley Chisolm, and "Thank You for Voting," a children's book about the history of voting in the United States. More on culture
Use leftover pumpkin purée in this dumpling dish. Deal with your fear of dentists. Here's how. Keep warm with an insulated vest. Create a website.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was continuity. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku, Connections and Strands. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. —David Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
|
“S’ka inflacion, nafta dhe interesat janë ulur”, Trump bën “bilancin” e
tarifave dhe premton: Nëse Kina nuk tërheq deri të martën tarifën 34%, SHBA
do të vendosë një tarifë shtesë 50%
-
Presidenti i SHBA-së, Donald Trump, ka reaguar në platformën X pas rritjes
së tarifave ndaj Shteteve të Bashkuara nga disa shtete, përfshirë Kinën, që
ka...
Hace 1 día
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario